Potential Civil Claims Against Pet Sitters for Negligence and Delayed Notification (California)
I am seeking general legal guidance under California law regarding potential civil claims against paid dog sitters arising from negligence, delayed notification, and misrepresentation. On Friday afternoon, while still in the sitters’ exclusive custody, my dog was admitted to a veterinary hospital and then transferred the same day to a second emergency facility without my knowledge. I was not notified of the injury, hospitalization, or transfer and was only informed after her death late Saturday night. After the fact, the sitters stated they were unable to contact me because their phone containing my contact information was “in the shop.” They also provided conflicting explanations for the cause of the injury, telling me via text that my dog “fell off a bed,” while telling the veterinary hospital she “fell down stairs.” Veterinary providers documented injuries consistent with significant blunt force trauma and noted that the injuries were inconsistent with the history provided at admission. Additionally, a third party unknown to me signed the veterinary admission paperwork as the owner, which has obstructed my access to complete medical records from the initial hospital. The veterinary providers advised that reports be made to Animal Care and Control and law enforcement due to the discrepancies and delayed notification. Under California law, how do courts typically evaluate civil claims involving paid pet sitters where there is exclusive custody, delayed notification of injury, conflicting explanations, and misrepresentation of ownership or care at veterinary admission? What factors most strongly affect whether such a case is viable in civil court?